Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn orders. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn orders. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Thứ Ba, 26 tháng 3, 2013

Italy's top court overturns Amanda Knox acquittal in murder case, orders new trial- VIDEO: How strong is the case against Knox?

Italy's highest criminal court on Tuesday overturned the acquittal of Amanda Knox in the slaying of her British roommate and ordered a new trial, prolonging a case that has become a cause celebre in the U.S.

The Court of Cassation ruled that an appeals court in Florence must re-hear the case against the American and her Italian-ex-boyfriend for the murder of 21-year-old Meredith Kercher. The exact issues that have to be reconsidered won't be known until the court releases its full ruling.

Lawyers for Knox and her ex-boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito looked grim as they huddled with prosecutors and court officials to get details after the ruling was issued. Lawyers for the Kercher family said they had got what they wanted.

Kercher's body was found in November 2007 in her bedroom of the house she shared with Knox and others in Perugia, an Italian university town where the two women were exchange students. Her throat had been slashed.

Prosecutors alleged Kercher was the victim of a drug-fueled sex game gone awry. Knox and Sollecito denied wrongdoing and said they weren't even in the apartment that night, though they acknowledged they had smoked marijuana and their memories were clouded.

An Ivory Coast man, Rudy Guede, was convicted of the slaying in a separate proceeding and is serving a 16-year sentence. Knox and Sollecito were also initially convicted of the murder and given long prison sentences, but were then acquitted on appeal and released.

The high court's ruling Tuesday overturns the appeals court acquittals.

Italian law cannot compel Knox to return from the U.S. for the new trial. The appellate court hearing the case could declare her in contempt of court but that carries no additional penalties.

It is unclear what would happen if she was convicted in a new appeals trial.

"If the court orders another trial, if she is convicted at that trial and if the conviction is upheld by the highest court, then Italy could seek her extradition," Knox's lawyer Carlo Dalla Vedova said Monday.

It would then be up to the United States to decide if it honors the request. U.S. and Italian authorities could also come to a deal that would keep Knox in the United States.

Knox, now 25, and Sollecito, who turned 29 on Tuesday, were arrested shortly after Kercher's body was found in a pool of blood.

The appeals court that acquitted them in 2011 criticized virtually the entire case mounted by prosecutors. The appellate court noted that the murder weapon was never found, said that DNA tests were faulty and that prosecutors provided no murder motive.

After nearly four years behind bars in Italy, Knox returned to her hometown of Seattle and Sollecito resumed his computer science studies, following the degree he successfully earned while studying in prison.

Knox is now a student at the University of Washington, according to her family spokesman, Dave Marriott.

Italy's judicial system allows for two levels of appeals, and prosecutors can appeal acquittals.

Although the court on Monday heard gruesome details, including how Kercher choked on her own blood, it wasn't ruling on the guilt or innocence of the defendants. Its sole task was to decide if the appellate trial was properly conducted.

Details of the ruling weren't issued Tuesday and won't be for several weeks.


View the original article here

Thứ Tư, 20 tháng 3, 2013

Source: Adrienne Maloof skipped 'Housewife' reunion because of court gag orders

  • MaloofNassir660.jpg

    Adrienne Maloof and Paul Nassir have filed dueling divorce petitions.X17 Online

  • Adrienne Maloof Reuters 660.JPG

    U.S. television personality and businesswoman Adrienne Maloof poses on the red carpet as she arrives as one of the judges for the Miss Universe 2011 pageant in Sao Paulo.Reuters

  • adrienne-maloof-ftr1

Even when one ejects themselves from a reality show, the drama lives on.

Rumors have been running rampant for weeks as to why Adrienne Maloof blew off the highly-anticipated “Real Housewives of Beverly Hills” reunion, which taped on March 1st. And just to add fuel to the fire, Bravo executive Andy Cohen has too taken to the TV screen to scold his former star over the absence.

“Well, today we are missing one of the Housewives who has been with us since the beginning. Adrienne Maloof has decided not to participate today,” he said in a clip posted on the network’s website. “This season was hard on Adrienne, as you all know. A secret about her family was revealed by Brandi (Glanville) and from that moment on, Adrienne refused to speak directly about it. We know that frustrated you in the audience. It frustrated all of us too…Adrienne won’t be here to tell her side of the story. Not only is she absent tonight, but she won’t be on the show next season.”

Ouch.

“Adrienne Maloof’s final act as a Housewife was not showing up tonight,” Cohen added.

But according to an insider, it wasn’t just a clear-cut case of Maloof simply deciding she did not want to attend.

“Of course Adrienne wanted to go on and say her part. But there was no way she could,” a source closely connected to the famous businesswoman. “She was strongly advised not to because of family court gag orders, which prohibits her from being allowed to discuss her divorce or custody whatsoever. And naturally, those topics would have come up on the show. So it was better she not go at all, to avoid any potential legal complications.”

Maloof’s tenure on the hit reality show turned sour last year when he co-star Brandi Granville revealed that she used a surrogate to have her twin sons, Christian and Colin, who are now six. Sparking something of a frenzy, Maloof’s marriage to plastic surgeon Dr. Paul Nassif soon fell apart, with their divorced finalized late last year, along with plenty of finger pointing as to whether Granville’s blurt caused the relationship to rupture.

And while all this makes for great reunion special fodder, apparently Maloof simply couldn’t risk treading anywhere near those forbidden topics.

“It was a smart decision on her part,” added the source. “She has too much to lose. Technically she can’t say anything at all, or she’s in violation of family court orders which are very common in these cases.”

Reps for Maloof and for Bravo declined to comment.


View the original article here