Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Support. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Support. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Chủ Nhật, 28 tháng 4, 2013

TECH SUPPORT NEEDED:Ex-Attorney General Says Bombers Likely Had Help

A former U.S. attorney general says the two men police say are behind the deadly Boston Marathon bombings likely had help in the attack.

“I don’t believe they couldn’t have done what they did without technical assistance building the bomb and without…spiritual encouragement,” Michael Mukasey, the former U.S. attorney general under George W. Bush, told Fox News.

Mukasey added that he thinks the belief that the bombers only followed a rulebook from the Internet “doesn’t do it” for him.

Mukasey joins a growing number of officials who say Boston Marathon bombing suspects Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 19, and his older brother, Tamerlan, who was killed in a shootout with police, likely had assistance in the bombing that killed three people and injured more than 200.

He also said Dzhokhar Tsarnaev could possibly still be questioned for national intelligence purposes for information that could be kept separate from the criminal case.

Mukasey said if those interviews occurred, Tsarnaev wouldn’t have any right to have a lawyer present during the questioning. If Tsarneav filed a habeas corpus petition against such interviews, the challenge could reach the Supreme Court, Mukasey explained, but he thinks the ability to question Tsarnaev separately for intelligence purposes would be upheld.

“The only thing the Fifth Amendment protects you against is being a witness against yourself. That means in a criminal trial,” Mukasey said. “It doesn’t protect you against disclosing national intelligence information.”

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev stopped speaking to FBI interrogators after he was read his Miranda rights and got an attorney.

But Mukasey told Fox News authorities still have “ample evidence” of the attack without Tsarnaev’s statements, citing photographs of the bombing scene and Tsarnaev’s confession to a carjacking after the bombings.


View the original article here

Thứ Ba, 16 tháng 4, 2013

Dr. Manny: Boston victims will need support

  • Boston.jpg

    A woman is comforted by a man near a triage tent set up for the Boston Marathon after explosions went off at the 117th Boston Marathon in Boston, Massachusetts April 15, 2013.Reuters

As the country wakes up the day after the horrific tragedy in Boston, the task at hand is now to help the injured recover and give them all the support that they need.

As of the latest reports, there were at least 176 wounded and as many as 10 amputations have already been performed, according to reports from FoxNews.com.  

Losing a limb is quite traumatic, but with modern technology and the proper support, people can regain their capabilities and go on to live full lives.  However, let’s not lose sight of the fact that the treatment and short-term recovery from these injuries is quite challenging.

When it comes to loss of limb, a patient’s outcome is predicated on several factors. If you’re talking about leg injuries, the site of the amputation – whether below the knee, through the knee or above the knee – matters greatly.

“The most common place to amputate is below the knee, to save the knee joint - and that makes walking (with a prostheses) much easier,” Dr. John Wilber, an orthopedic/trauma surgeon with the UH Case Medical Center in Cleveland, Ohio, told FoxNews.com.

The surgical decision, of course, is based on tissue damage and adequate blood supply.

Because of the traumatic nature of these injuries, victims will likely undergo two to three surgeries over the course of three to four days, Wilber said. While doctors will treat patients with antibiotics, patients are still at serious risk for infection, Wilber noted.

“Unfortunately, because of the contamination, you are vulnerable to almost any type of infection from multiple different organisms,” Wilber said.

The operative techniques are well understood by the surgical team.  But for the patient, the post-operative period becomes more important. Active management of pain can be challenging, especially when patients complain of what is known as phantom limb pain. This is a condition where patients still feel that they have pain in areas where their limbs once were – especially in the short-term after surgery.

Two important components of recovery have to do with the involvement of physiotherapists and occupational therapists. These people are instrumental, because they are going to be responsible for developing the prosthetic devices needed.  These tools will help patients begin to move and exercise the new muscle groups they will need to utilize in order to become more mobile.

Eventually, these folks will go home and changes will have to be made, not only in their lifestyle, but in their homes, their bedrooms and sometimes even the bathrooms. Occupational therapists can help to address some of the issues that patients who go home will eventually have to undertake.

Finally, patients will need lots of emotional support. Post-traumatic stress syndrome is something that becomes quite prevalent in these tragic terrorist attacks. Mental health workers will need to focus intensively on making sure that these folks get all the help they need.

What we can do as a country is pray, give them our love and never forget.


View the original article here

Thứ Hai, 8 tháng 4, 2013

Support Grows for Gun Bill Filibuster

The White House on Monday lashed out at Republican lawmakers threatening to filibuster gun control legislation in the Senate, accusing them of trying to "hide" behind procedural maneuvers -- as support for the filibuster continued to grow. 

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, announced Monday afternoon that a total of 13 senators had signed a letter to Majority Leader Harry Reid threatening to oppose "any legislation that would infringe on the American people's constitutional right to bear arms." Reid, at the same time, took the first steps to bring the gun control package to the floor for Senate debate, while saying he was "deeply troubled" by their warning. 

Lee, along with Sens. Rand Paul, R-Ky., and Ted Cruz, R-Texas, have led efforts to hold up the legislation. They would do so by trying to require a 60-vote threshold, which could kill the legislation. 

Senators returned Monday from a two-week spring recess, and negotiators are hard at work trying to refine and prep a bill for consideration. While Lee, Paul, Cruz and others dug in on their objections, other moderates and conservatives have indicated a willingness to consider the package. 

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, using pointed language, accused the hold-outs of trying to "hide" behind the filibuster. At Monday's press briefing, he invoked the families of the Newtown shooting victims to pressure them into allowing an up-or-down vote. 

"Imagine what would they say to the families of the victims of Newtown about why a certain measure never came to a vote, because they filibustered. ... That would certainly be inappropriate." 

Carney suggested any lawmaker who applauded for Obama on the issue of gun violence victims "when the cameras were on" during the State of the Union address should "live up to that applause ... and not take the less courageous route by using procedural measures to block a vote." 

He added: "If they oppose this legislation, have the courage to say so on the floor and vote no. Don't block it. Don't hide behind a procedural action to prevent the vote." 

President Obama will continue to try to rally support for a bill during his visit to the University of Hartford, in Connecticut, on Monday. An administration official said 11 family members of Sandy Hook victims will ride back to Washington with Obama on Air Force One. They had planned to lobby lawmakers on Tuesday in support of gun control. 

Amid the campaign for public support, two key senators are said to be working behind the scenes on the tricky issue of background checks. 

Pennsylvania Republican Sen. Pat Toomey and West Virginia Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin are reportedly in talks for a proposal to expand the checks to gun shows and Internet sales -- but, importantly, exempt some sales between hunters or close relatives. 

It's unclear whether such a proposal would be embraced by pro-gun rights conservatives and the National Rifle Association, which so far has opposed the kind of comprehensive firearms legislation pushed by Obama and his allies in Congress. But the issue of family members and others being subjected to an expanded background check system for sales between them has become an obstacle. 

The most controversial element of a gun control package -- a renewed ban on assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines -- has been dropped from the main bill, though it will still likely get a vote as an amendment. But the push to expand background checks remains and has emerged as a sticking point, though White House aides and congressional Democrats point to polling that shows public support for universal background checks strong. 

Opponents to the expanded checks worry that the new system could be cumbersome for family members and others involved in casual transfers. 

Carney declined to comment in any depth on the Toomey-Manchin talks at Monday's briefing.


View the original article here

Chủ Nhật, 24 tháng 3, 2013

OPPOSITION SUPPORT: Members of Assad's Sect Form Group to Back Rebels

  • Mideast Egypt Syria_Angu660.jpg

    March 24, 2013: Syrian Alawites Mahmoud Maraie, second left, and Bassam al-Malek, second right, talk with other members of the Syrian Alawite sect who are opposed to Syrian President Bashar Assad in Cairo, Egypt. Members of Assad's Alawite sect met in Cairo on Sunday in an attempt to distance themselves from the Damascus regime in its crack down on the Syrian revolution.AP

Dozens of people from Syrian President Bashar Assad's own minority sect met in Cairo on Sunday to send an unusual message to their fellow Alawites back home: Join the opposition before it is too late.

The Alawites have long been seen as a backbone of the Assad regime, and a decision to support the rebel force in Syria is complicated by the fact that many see their own futures interlocked with Assad's survival.

The pressure on Alawites who dare oppose Assad comes not only from the regime, but also from within their own families. Nearly all of the 50 Alawites at the opposition conference have been arrested, abused or threatened for their political views. One participant said he received an email threatening his life if he attended the conference.

The Alawites, an offshoot of Shiite Islam, are a tiny sect, representing roughly 12 percent of Syria's population. Many live in towns and villages along the mountainous Mediterranean coast. Most have either rallied behind Assad or stayed quietly on the sidelines of the 2-year-old civil war, which has killed more than 70,000 people.

The opposition meeting — the first of its kind for Alawite Syrians since the war began — reflects fears that they would fall victim to revenge killings and assassinations should Assad's regime fall. Some are particularly worried about the influx of foreign jihadist fighters into Syria who view Shiites as heretics.

Many minority Alawites see the war in Syria as a fight for survival against the Sunni majority. Alawites hold key posts in the army alongside some Sunnis and members of other groups that have been given top government and military positions to foster loyalty to the regime.

A statement by the Alawite opposition group said "the Syrian regime has no identity except that of tyranny."

"The Syrian regime lies when it says it protects minorities, particularly the Alawites ... in an attempt to portray to the world that it is fighting Islamic extremists and terrorism," the statement said.

Rita al-Suleiman, 29, said she had to flee Syria last year after her brother told her that he had been questioned in prison about her anti-regime activities in Homs.

"I was at first careful not to attend meetings, but then my family said they have nothing to do with me so I grew bolder," she said. "It's been very hard to leave them behind."

Like others at the conference, she said many Syrians are no longer afraid to voice their opinions, but that Alawites are under greater pressure from members of their own community not to speak out.

Bashar Aboud, 40, said his relatives warned his parents they would burn their house down if he continued defying the regime. The 40 year-old father of two, who now resides in Cairo after fleeing Syria during a 2001 crackdown on opposition figures, said his parents were forced to go on Syrian TV and disown him.

Those at the conference stressed that Alawites have long been and want to continue to be a part of the fabric of Syrian society.

"In the end we are all on the same boat and it's sinking," Aboud said, referring to Syria's precarious situation. "We are part of the team that is trying to save this boat."

One participant described the conferees as a real opposition movement that does not want to be separated from the homeland. He said he opposed dividing Syria along sectarian lines or the possibility of a breakaway enclave for Alawites as was the case under French mandate for a few years in the late 1930s.

He spoke on condition of anonymity because he feared reprisals against his family in Syria.

Despite efforts by the participants to frame the conflict as a despotic regime against its people, signs of sectarian warfare are rife in Syria.

The army is being reinforced by pro-regime militias, packed with Alawites who have been accused of conducting massacres in which hundreds of civilians, including women and children, were killed.

The Syrian government claims gunmen driven by the agendas of foreign countries are responsible for the killings, but the United Nations and other witnesses have confirmed that at least some were carried out by pro-regime vigilante fighters.

Another Alawite participant at the conference said his two sons were forced out of work last year to serve in one of the national security branches, and were deployed to areas of heavy fighting, including the outskirts of Damascus.

He claimed that his sons, ages 28 and 30, had witnessed severe beatings and killings by the regime. The participant, a long-time opposition activist who wrote under the pseudo name Sami Saleh, said he and his two sons relied on Sunni fighters in the rebel Free Syrian Army to help them escape through Turkey.

He also spoke on condition of anonymity out of fear of reprisal against relatives still in Syria.

Some three-fourths of Syrians are Sunni Muslims, but the country is also home to other Muslim groups, as well as Christians and ethnic communities of Kurds, Armenians and others. All coexisted with varying degrees of ease under Assad's regime, founded more than four decades ago by his father, Hafez, and inherited by Bashar in 2000.

The Alawite opposition conference was funded by rich businessmen from the sect, according to its organizer Bassam Youssef, who was detained for 11 years under Hafez for his communist activities against the ruling Baath Party.

A large green-striped Syrian rebel flag draped the speaker's podium and a banner in the back read: "We are all Syria. We are with a united Syria."

Several members of the main Sunni-led Syrian opposition coalition also attended the Alawite conference in solidarity. They too have struggled, coalescing around a unified voice. Its president, Mouaz al-Khatib, resigned Sunday citing frustration with the level of international support and constraints imposed by the body itself.


View the original article here

Thứ Hai, 4 tháng 3, 2013

FOX NEWS POLL: Majority of American Voters Support Use of Drones

American voters approve of the United States using unmanned drones to kill suspected terrorists abroad -- even if the targets are U.S. citizens -- but don’t think the president should be able to order the strikes on his own.

That’s according to the latest Fox News poll.  

Overall, 74 percent of voters approve of using drones to kill a suspected terrorist overseas.  That includes majorities of Republicans (80 percent), independents (71 percent) and Democrats (69 percent), as well as both men (78 percent) and women (71 percent).  

The level of approval drops from 74 percent to 60 percent, however, if the suspected terrorist is a U.S. citizen.  

Even when it comes to drone use on U.S. soil, a 56-percent majority of voters approves of such strikes on a suspected foreign terrorist.  

Voters, however, disapprove of drone attacks when they are aimed at a U.S. citizen suspected of being a terrorist on U.S. soil.  In those circumstances, by a 50-45 percent margin, voters say no.  

CLICK TO VIEW THE POLL

In each follow-up scenario, Republicans and men are slightly more approving than Democrats and women -- just like in the overall scenario.  

Issues about the use of drone attacks emerged from recent Senate confirmation hearings for John Brennan, who has been nominated to head the CIA.  Brennan is known as the chief architect of the CIA’s drone program.  Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul is threatening to delay Brennan’s confirmation until he gets more information about the government’s use of drones, including whether the president “has the power to authorize lethal force, such as a drone strike, against a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil.”  Paul says this brings up serious constitutional issues because if “you’re accused of a crime in America you get your day in court.”

The poll finds that 32 percent of voters think that yes, the president should be able to authorize the use of deadly force domestically against an American terrorist.  Still, about twice that many -- 63 percent -- disagree and want checks on the president.

Again, agreement is bipartisan, as most Republicans (70 percent) and independents (70 percent) and a majority of Democrats (54 percent) oppose the president having the sole power under these conditions.

The Fox News poll is based on landline and cell phone interviews with 1,010 randomly chosen registered voters nationwide and was conducted under the joint direction of Anderson Robbins Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R) from February 25 to February 27.  The full poll has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points.


View the original article here