Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Strikes. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Strikes. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Chủ Nhật, 5 tháng 5, 2013

'RED LINE' CROSSED?Syria Says Israel Strikes Military Research Center

Israeli missiles struck a research center near the Syrian capital Damascus, setting off explosions and causing casualties, Syria's state news agency reported early Sunday, citing initial reports.

If confirmed, it would be the second Israeli strike on targets in Syria in three days, signaling a sharp escalation of Israel's involvement in Syria's bloody civil war.

There was no immediate Israeli comment. However, Israel has said it will not allow sophisticated weapons to flow from Syria to the Lebanese Hezbollah militia, an ally of Syrian President Bashar Assad and a heavily armed foe of the Jewish state.

Two previous Israeli airstrikes, one in January and one on Friday, targeted weapons apparently bound for Hezbollah, Israeli and U.S. officials have said.

The Syrian state news agency SANA reported early Sunday that explosions went off at the Jamraya research center near Damascus, causing casualties. "Initial reports point to these explosions being a result of Israeli missiles that targeted the research center in Jamraya," SANA said.

A Syrian activist group, the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, also reported large explosions in the area of Jamraya, a military and scientific research facility northwest of Damascus, about 10 miles from the Lebanese border.

An amateur video said to be shot early Sunday in the Damascus area showed a huge ball of fire lighting up the night sky. The video appeared genuine and corresponded to other Associated Press reporting.

Israel's first airstrike in Syria, in January, also struck Jamraya.

At the time, a U.S. official said Israel targeted trucks next to the research center that carried SA-17 anti-aircraft missiles. The strikes hit both the trucks and the research facility, the official said. The Syrian military didn't confirm a hit on a weapons shipment at the time, saying only that Israeli warplanes bombed the research center.

On Saturday, Israeli officials confirmed that a day earlier, Israeli aircraft targeted advanced surface-to-surface missiles in Syria that were apparently bound for Hezbollah.

The missiles were believed to be m600s, a Syrian version of Iran's Fatah 110 missile, an extremely accurate guided missile capable of traveling roughly 190 miles with a half-ton warhead, an Israeli official said

The Israeli officials spoke anonymously because they had not been given permission to speak publicly about the matter.

In Washington, a Pentagon spokeswoman said she had no information relating to Sunday's report of a new Israeli airstrike in Syria.

President Barack Obama said Saturday, before the latest incident, that it was up to Israel to confirm or deny any strikes, but that the U.S. coordinates very closely with Israel.

"The Israelis, justifiably, have to guard against the transfer of advanced weaponry to terrorist organizations like Hezbollah," Obama told the Spanish-language TV station Telemundo.

Israel has said it wants to stay out of the brutal Syria war, but could inadvertently be drawn in as it tries to bolster its deterrence and prevent sophisticated weapons from reaching Hezbollah.

Since the conflict in Syria erupted more than two years ago, fighting has repeatedly spilled into Turkey, Lebanon, Iraq, Jordan and the Israeli-annexed Golan Heights.

Renewed concern about a wider conflagration come as Washington considers how to respond to indications that the Syrian regime may have used chemical weapons in its civil war.

Obama has described the use of such weapons as a "red line," and the administration is weighing its options -- including possible military action.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, meanwhile, has drawn his own red line, saying repeatedly that the Jewish state would be prepared to take military action to prevent Hezbollah from obtaining new weapons that could upset the balance of power.

Israel believes Hezbollah has restocked its arsenal with tens of thousands of rockets and missiles since a 2006 war between the two ended in a stalemate.

Israel is concerned that Hezbollah will take advantage of the chaos in Syria to smuggle advanced weapons into Lebanon.

These include anti-aircraft missiles, which could hamper Israel's ability to operate in Lebanese skies, and advanced Yakhont missiles that are used to attack naval ships from the coast.

In recent days, there were signs of mounting tensions between Israel and Hezbollah.

In a warning to Israel earlier this week, Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah said his militia "is ready and has its hand on the trigger" in the event of an Israeli attack on any targets in Lebanon.

The Israeli military, meanwhile, called up several thousand reservists earlier this week for what it called a "surprise" military exercise on its border with Lebanon.

Details about Friday's strike remained sketchy.

The U.S. officials said the airstrike apparently hit a warehouse, but gave no other details.

Israeli officials did not say where in Syria the Israeli aircraft struck or whether they fired from Lebanese, Syrian or Israeli airspace.

Israel possesses bombs that can travel a long distance before striking their target. The use of such weapons could allow Israel to carry out the attack without entering Syrian skies, which would risk coming under fire from the regime's advanced, Russian-made anti-aircraft defenses.

The Syrian government said it had no information on an Israeli attack, while Hezbollah and the Israeli military spokesman's office declined comment.

Amos Gilad, an Israeli defense official, would not confirm or deny the airstrike, but played down cross-border tensions.

Hezbollah has not obtained any of Syria's large chemical weapons arsenal and is not interested in such weapons, Gilad said. Instead, the militia is "enthusiastic about other weapons systems and rockets that reach here (Israel)," he said Saturday in a speech in southern Israel.

Assad "is not provoking Israel and the incidents along the border (between Syria and the Israeli-controlled Golan) are coincidental," Gilad said.

With Israel apparently enforcing its red lines, much now depends on the response from Hezbollah and Syria, analysts said.

Israeli officials have long feared that Assad may try to draw Israel into the civil war in hopes of diverting attention and perhaps rallying Arab support behind him.

But retaliation for Israeli airstrikes would come at a high price, said Moshe Maoz, an Israeli expert on Syria.

"Bashar has his own problems and he knows that conflict with Israel would cause the collapse of his regime," Maoz said. "He could have done that long ago, but he knows he will fall if Israel gets involved."

Hezbollah, which is fighting alongside Assad's troops, appears to have linked its fate to the survival of the Syrian regime. Nasrallah, the Hezbollah chief, said this week that Syria's allies "will not allow Syria to fall into the hands of America or Israel."

On the other hand, Hezbollah could endanger its position as Lebanon's main political and military force if it confronts Israel, and it's not clear if the militia is willing to take that risk.

The U.S. concerns have focused on Syria's chemical weapons.

Obama has said the use of chemical weapons would have "enormous consequences," but has also said he needs more definitive proof before making a decision about how to respond.

Obama said Friday that he didn't foresee a scenario in which the U.S. would send troops to Syria. Instead, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has said Washington is reviewing its opposition to arming the opposition.

The U.S. so far has balked at sending weapons to the rebels, fearing the arms could end up in the hands of al-Qaida-linked groups or other extremists in the opposition ranks.

Secretary of State John Kerry, meanwhile, is heading to Moscow next week to try to persuade Russian President Vladimir Putin to support, or at least not veto, a fresh effort to impose U.N. penalties on Syria if Assad doesn't begin political transition talks with the opposition.

Russia, alongside China, has blocked U.S.-led efforts three times at the United Nations to pressure Assad into stepping down.


View the original article here

Thứ Ba, 19 tháng 3, 2013

KNIVES ON PLANES: Senate Candidate Strikes Chord With TSA Challenge

  • Markey_TSA.jpg

    FILE: March 4, 2013: Democratic U.S. Senate hopeful and Rep. Edward Markey speaks to supporters outside the Statehouse in Boston, Mass.AP

With a Swiss Army knife in hand, Massachusetts Democratic Rep. Ed Markey visited Boston’s Logan Airport last week to make a very public showing of his efforts stop the federal government from allowing airline passengers to bring small, folding knives on board.

Markey, who has held his House seat since 1976 and now is running for Senate, appears to dug up potential political gold. By railing against the TSA rule change, he's also aligning with the unions and other security advocates in a state -- and city -- where two of the planes hijacked on Sept. 11, 2001, departed.

"On 9/11, we learned that in the confines of an airline cabin, even a small knife can lead to devastating consequences," Markey said Tuesday, flanked by pilots and flight attendants. 

Though Markey argues he is already a well-known Transportation Security Administration bulldog and wouldn’t use this for political gain, political observers say he has a sixth sense for such issues and has picked yet another. The position also could help him draw away support from his union-backed Democratic opponent. 

“This is an easy lay up,” David Heller, Democratic political strategist and president of Main Street Communications, said Monday. “Nobody will push back on this.”

Markey is trying to stop the TSA from allowing passengers next month to carry the knives, as well as miniature, souvenir baseball bats and such sporting goods as ski poles and hockey sticks, onto airplanes cabins.

Knives with blades shorter than 2.36 inches and no wider than one-half inch would be permitted, but box cutters like those used by the 9/11 hijackers still are banned. TSA chief John Pistole announced the changes earlier this month as an effort to help agents search for explosives and other, more dangerous items and said the changes will take effect April 25.

Meanwhile, Markey appears determined to add to his early lead in his primary race for the Senate seat formerly held by now-Secretary of State John Kerry -- and to avoid a special election upset like the one in 2010.

He already has a 29-point lead against his lone Democratic opponent, fellow Massachusetts Rep. Stephen Lynch, according a poll earlier this month by The Boston Herald and the University of Massachusetts Lowell.

The winner of the party’s April 30 primary is the likely favorite to win the June 25 general election, considering Massachusetts is a solidly Democratic state -- though former Sen. Scott Brown proved in 2010 that a Republican can win a Senate seat in the Bay State.

In the Republican primary, former U.S. attorney for Massachusetts Michael Sullivan appears to be leading the two other candidates, state Rep. Daniel Winslow and investment executive and former Navy SEAL Gabriel Gomez, according to a recent straw poll.

Sullivan, who helped prosecute “shoe bomber” Richard Reid -- who in December 2001 attempted to blown up a U.S. commercial flight -- also opposes the TSA change.

“It makes no sense to me that TSA would consider the knives to be non-threatening, while box-cutters continue to pose concerns,” he said in a statement Friday. “TSA should reverse this policy decision immediately."

Markey -- who in 2005 unsuccessfully opposed a TSA effort to allow small scissors and other sharp objects on board – also has introduced House legislation to override the agency.

And he has garnered support from several of the country’s biggest pilot, flight attendant and air marshal unions for blocking the policy change, which also is being opposed by two major airlines.

Lynch, who on 9/11 won the Democratic primary for his House seat, reportedly opposed the TSA change, too.  However, his campaign office could not be reached for comment Monday.

Lynch, a former ironworker and union official, also has received several endorsement from organized labor -- including ones from the national Ironworkers union and the Massachusetts Nurses Association-National Nurses United, the state’s largest nurses union.

However, he lost the key Service Employees International Union endorsement last week to Markey.

Beyond what strategists have said about Markey’s efforts, his congressional staff has privately said he has seized on a potent issue. 

Still, Markey must defend against being portrayed as a career Washington politician.

Heller doesn’t foresee another special election disaster for Massachusetts Democrats like the one in 2010 when state Attorney General Martha Coakley lost the general election to Brown.

“Markey will have more time and a way less formidable Republican challenger,” he said. “If Markey doesn’t win double digits, something went terribly wrong.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report.


View the original article here

Chủ Nhật, 17 tháng 3, 2013

UNCONSTITUTIONAL:Federal Judge Strikes Down FBI Surveillance Law

  • fbiwarantless12z.jpg

    Feb. 10, 2009: The main headquarters of the FBI, the J. Edgar Hoover Building, in Washington, DC.AP

A federal judge has struck down a set of laws allowing the FBI to issue so-called national security letters to banks, phone companies and other businesses demanding customer information.

U.S. District Judge Susan Illston said the laws violate the First Amendment and the separation of powers principles and ordered the government to stop issuing the secretive letters or enforcing their gag orders, The Wall Street Journal reported.

The FBI almost always bars recipients of the letters from disclosing to anyone — including customers — that they have even received the demands, Illston said in the ruling released Friday.

The government has failed to show that the letters and the blanket non-disclosure policy "serve the compelling need of national security," and the gag order creates "too large a danger that speech is being unnecessarily restricted," the San Francisco-based Illston wrote.

A Department of Justice spokesman told the Journal the department was "reviewing the order."

FBI counter-terrorism agents began issuing the letters, which don't require a judge's approval, after Congress passed the USA Patriot Act in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

The case arises from a lawsuit that lawyers with the Electronic Frontier Foundation filed in 2011 on behalf of an unnamed telecommunications company that received an FBI demand for customer information.

"We are very pleased that the court recognized the fatal constitutional shortcomings of the NSL statute," EFF lawyer Matt Zimmerman said. "The government's gags have truncated the public debate on these controversial surveillance tools. Our client looks forward to the day when it can publicly discuss its experience."

Illston wrote that she was also troubled by the limited powers judges have to lift the gag orders.

Judges can eliminate the gag order only if they have "no reason to believe that disclosure may endanger the national security of the United States, interfere with a criminal counter-terrorism, or counterintelligence investigation, interfere with diplomatic relations, or endanger the life or physical safety of any person."

That provision also violated the Constitution because it blocks meaningful judicial review.

Illston ordered the FBI to cease issuing the letters, but put her order on hold for 90 days so the U.S. Department of Justice can appeal to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Illston isn't the first federal judge to find the letters troubling. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York also found the gag order unconstitutional, but allowed the FBI to continue issuing them if it made changes to its system such as notifying recipients they can ask federal judges to review the letters.

Illston ruled Friday that it's up to Congress, and not the courts, to tinker with the letters.

In 2007, the Justice Department's inspector general found widespread violations in the FBI's use of the letters, including demands without proper authorization and information obtained in non-emergency circumstances. The FBI has tightened oversight of the system.

The FBI made 16,511 national security letter requests for information regarding 7,201 people in 2011, the latest data available. The FBI uses the letters to collect unlimited kinds of sensitive, private information like financial and phone records.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Click here for more from The Wall Street Journal.


View the original article here